One of the most overlooked principles in investing is also one of the simplest:

Intrinsic value matters.

Intrinsic value is the underlying economic engine that gives an asset real worth—cash flow, profits, rents, dividends, or some form of productive utility. It’s the gravitational force that keeps an asset from drifting into fantasy pricing.

But when an asset has no intrinsic value, everything changes. Its price is driven entirely by belief, sentiment, and the hope that someone else will pay more later. And when one entity begins to own too much of that asset, the situation becomes even more unstable.

Right now, this isn’t just a theoretical discussion. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) reportedly owns roughly 650,000 Bitcoin—about 4% of all BTC still in existence after accounting for lost coins. That’s an extraordinary level of concentration.

And it raises a critical question for every investor:

What is the tipping point where owning too much of a non-productive asset becomes dangerous—both for the market and for average investors?

The More You Own, the Less Stable the Asset Becomes

Here’s the fundamental issue:
When an asset has no intrinsic value, the only return you can possibly earn is from selling it to someone else for more than you paid.

But as your ownership concentration increases, your pool of potential buyers shrinks.

If you own:

  • 10% of the supply — your trades can move the market
  • 20% — your ability to exit becomes limited
  • 40% — you risk destabilizing the asset simply by rebalancing
  • 60% — you effectively are the market

And when a single entity owns enough to distort normal market dynamics, everyone else—especially average investors—takes on hidden risk they may not understand.

If You Own 100% of a Non-Productive Asset

The logical endpoint reveals everything.

If you own 100% of a non-productive asset:

  • It produces no cash
  • It generates no dividends
  • It has no utility
  • No one else needs it
  • You cannot sell it
  • There is no market
  • The price is fictional
  • The value is zero

An asset nobody needs is an asset nobody values.
And an asset nobody values is worth nothing — no matter what price you paid.

This logic applies not only at 100%, but in varying degrees as concentration grows. Once ownership becomes too centralized, the pricing mechanism becomes an illusion supported only by narrowing belief.

Why This Should Matter to the Average Investor

Even if you never own 1%, 5%, or even 0.01% of something like Bitcoin, concentrated ownership introduces risks for everyone else:

1. Prices can be artificially inflated.

If a dominant holder accumulates aggressively, the price reflects their buying—not broad market demand.
Average investors may mistake this for organic growth.

2. Your ability to exit depends on their behavior.

If the major holder sells—or is forced to sell—the price can collapse instantly.

3. Liquidity can vanish.

A market supported by a small number of large players can dry up quickly when conditions change.

4. You bear risk without receiving compensation.

Concentration creates fragility but does not provide additional expected return to small holders.

5. You may misunderstand what is actually driving the asset’s price.

Many everyday investors assume a rising price equals rising value.
But when intrinsic value is zero, price reflects only psychology—not economics.

This is why the average investor must be extremely cautious with assets whose value is dependent on belief rather than production.

What Productive Assets Offer That Speculative Assets Can’t

If you owned 100% of:

  • a profitable business
  • a rental property
  • a dividend-paying company

…you would still receive:

  • earnings
  • profits
  • rents
  • dividends

Value comes from the asset itself, not from selling it.

That is why intrinsic value provides durability and resilience.
And why speculative assets, by contrast, become fragile as ownership concentration increases.

Concentration + No Intrinsic Value = Fragility

When one entity owns too much of an asset with no intrinsic value:

  • the market becomes artificially supported
  • the exit door narrows
  • volatility increases
  • the risk of collapse grows
  • everyday investors unknowingly bear the risk

This isn’t theoretical. It’s structural.

The more one person or company owns, the more the asset’s “price” becomes detached from the real world. And the more average investors must rely on the continued goodwill, stability, and financial health of that single owner—without realizing it.

For Average Investors: The Practical Lesson

The takeaway isn’t “avoid all speculative assets.”
It’s more nuanced:

Speculative assets should never be a large percentage of your portfolio
because their value depends entirely on someone else showing up.

When ownership is concentrated and intrinsic value is zero, the margin of safety disappears.

Diversification, productive assets, and intrinsic value aren’t old-fashioned—they’re oxygen.

Bottom Line

Concentrated ownership doesn’t make a non-productive asset stronger.
It makes it more fragile.

When value depends solely on belief, and belief depends on a shrinking set of participants, the system becomes increasingly unstable. Average investors often step into that system without understanding the hidden risk.

The more someone else owns, the more careful you should be.

Because at some point, the price stops reflecting the market—and starts reflecting the behavior of one owner.

And when that owner moves, everyone else pays the price.

Contact Us